Hello,
I am trying to understand what causes a business partner to have the check scenario of B1, rather than A1, C1, etc. Does the B1 scenario occur only when we recheck business partners after receiving an updated file from MKData? I have a business partner that has several entries in /SAPSLL/SPLAUD with scenario B1.
Thank you in advance,
Alison
Hi Hema,
Can you please detail on point 4 "Legal regulation should not be activated for the country NL".
In other point you specified create "Create License type (NLR ) for the NL legal regulation", in this case NLR will be determined for all documents
Please help elaborate on the steps.
Thanks,
Amit
Hello Alison,
From your description is C1 scenario. B1 is screening against all SPL master data.
B1:-Periodic Screening done against all SPL files for GTS Business Partners
C1:- Periodic Screening done against Delta SPL files for GTS Business Partners
Best regards,
Vincent
Dear Experts
I have a couple of questions on the GTS IPR process;
1. How does the Prior Export Equivalency (PEE) works in IPR. What steps need to be executed to determine whether Equivalency was applied after re-export
2. In case the client hold separate authorizations for its FTOs, how does GTS handle the duty liability transfer between the entities. Is there a process for C88 SAD Procedure in GTS
Request your inputs on these.
Regards
Amit
HI Amit,
for point 1).
As far as i remember, this is an arrangement with the Customs authorities that one material code (component) can be declared for re-export (as part of finsihed goods) without a precise check/track if the compoenents contained in this FG are procured domestically or imported. Both sources can be mixed during the production transformation.
there is a flag in the IPR licence in GTS; Equivalence principle.
Besides that, maybe on the Stock overview for a product there maybe a field as well, but i dont think you need further settings in the system.
The important is that the products procured domestically are entered in a non IPR Storage location and the imported components are received in an IPR storage location. The finished goods could be all stored in the IPR storage location - the imported and domestically procured components are mixed. During re-export, the sales is picking from the IPR storage location, the system can't consume more components than what was initially received in the IPR storage location. This ensures there is no abuse. This is how i have proceeded with the Equivalence principel for IPR.
I am not sure this helps you.
I hope so
Kind regards
Assen
Thank you, I was able to discover the B1 scenario is assigned when the SPL check is run by a user via the Blocked BP transaction.
HI Alison,
The B1 screening can be run directly via transaction /n/SAPSLL/SPL_CHSB1LO (or /SAPSLL/SPL_CHSB1MLO for batch job) and also as you have already determined you can run the B1 screening from the Blocked Partner transactions (/SAPSLL/SPL_BLBPLO).
KBA 1454104 - (KBA: Scenarios for sanctioned party list (SPL) screening in Global
Trade Services (GTS))lists the screening scenarios and transaction, this might be helpful to you.
Kind Regards
Ann Marie
Hi Amit,
Just to clarify Assen's answer; the "prior export" of IPR goods is allowed in case the customer requires the goods more urgently than the vendor can supply. In that case, if the trader already has stock in free-circulation, and provided there is no appreciable difference between that stock and the stock to be purchased from the IPR vendor (that's to say, the customer would find them equivalent, and could not prefer one above the other), the trader may supply the free-circulation stock and subsequently "back-fill" by importing to IPR.
The system models that equivalence by allowing the IPR stock quantity to go negative until such time as the new import to IPR is made.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Dave
Thanks Assen and Dave for the response.
The Equivalency principle was the only relevant setup I found as well in authorization. In the stock list, if my re-exports exceeded the imports for IPR goods, I will see 'Total anticipated stock' as the balance. The export declaration that is created for the balance qty. will not have the 'IP closing portions' info but is displayed in the receipt/issue list.
Is there any other std. report that provides clear visibility of the documents that correspond to the free circulation stock used for IPR export instead of the drill down I need to do from the FIFO or Receipt/Issue list.
Dave, what is that 'appreciable difference' which, if exceeded, will throw up an exception or error - is this configurable in the system?
Appreciate if someone can also throw light on the second point related to authorization in my post:
"In case the client hold separate authorizations for its FTOs how does GTS handle the duty liability transfer between the entities carrying these separate authorizations. Is there a way in GTS to handle C88 SAD procedure?"
Regards
Amit
Hi expects
I am Abaper and new to SAP GTS i need some documents on GTS.
Hello,
We have an issue while deleting the Intrastat Declaration.
When we select the Intrastat declaration and click on delete button from the overview of declarations, Immedietly we are getting the error message as
" You are not authorized for activity delete (06)".But once we come out and check the screen again , the entry was deleted.
user also have the authorization to delete the Intrastat declaration.but still the error message is coming .Not sure why.
please suggest on this.I know this is more related to Authorization, but want to know if somebody would have faced this issue.
Thanks
Diwakar Reddy
Thanks Shrinivas, after implementing the note this issue is resolved. Also this note is part of service pack 15 and but we are behind.
Once again thanks for your help and prompt response!!!
Hi Amit,
To answer your questions:
The "appreciable difference" is the Product number, and (if used) the "Stock ID" or Country of Origin.
There is no way to handle IPR transfers in GTS, either internally or externally. It's unfortunate, but true.
Regards,
Dave
Hi Diwakar,
Have you checked in SU53 to see which authorization object the error is being issued on?
Then ensure that the relevant authorization is assigned to the user (or the relevant role).
Thanks
Ann Marie
Hi Friends,
We have around 2.6 million unwanted vendors in GTS and would like to delete them.
We are following the 2 step process.
1 We are first running running BUPA_DEL and it is successfully deleting the record from BUT000.
2 Then we ran program /SAPSLL/BP_DATA_CLEANUP to do clean up but it is showing below error.
Error in Step 2: Archive the listed objects manually /SAPSLL/SPLAUD.
Query 1: Is there any step which need to be done before running the clean up program which will remove entry from table /SAPSLL/SPLAUD?
In the interest of time, we created a deletion program to delete desired BPs from SPLAUD table and then we ran the clean up program mentioned in step 2 and it completed successfully.
Now, since we have 2.6 millions, we started doing this test for only 10K vendors.
Step 1 BUPA_DEL for 10K BPs as batch- Completed in 5 mins
Step 2 Run Custom program ZDEL_SPLAUD for 10 K BPs as batch- Completed in 20 mins
Step 3 Run clean up program /SAPSLL/BP_DATA_CLEANUP for 10 K BPs batch- Still running
It has been 3 days and still the step 3 job is running, I checked with the DBAs and as per them it is still doing backend processing.
Query 2: Is it OK to use a custom program to delete entries from SPLAUD(These are unwanted vendors so business is OK from AUDIT perspective to delete these entries)
Query 3 what can be done for performance on Clean up program as it will take ages to do this for 2.6 million vendors.
Your suggestion will be appreciated!
Regards,
Naveen Rajora
Hi Naveen,
If you run the program /SAPSLL/BP_DATA_CLEANUP in simulation mode, it is supposed to show the details of which records can be/cannot be processed. You may want to try it.
The error you are referring to should occur only if GTS tables /SAPSLL/PNTBP (mapping table of BP) are not archived with CA_BUPA. Refer this note 2162902 - Unable to archive business partner with GTS specified content
On the order versions this issue used to occur due to inconsistent entries being present in table /SAPSLLPNTBP which didn't exist in BUT000. There must be a note around this as well. You may want to check if note is active for your version.
From a performance standpoint, you may want to check the below note which was released to improve the performance of the BP delete.
1788340 - Performance enhancement: /SAPSLL/BP_DATA_CLEANUP
Thanks,
Shrini
Hi Diwakar,
This was a problem on version 10.0, Intrastat declaration used to get deleted but would show a message that you don't have authorization to delete.
If you are on 10 or higher version, you may want to check this note 2025845, it's a code correction which needs to be applied.
Thanks,
Shrini
Thanks for your inputs Dave. Will need to look at the custom functionality for IPR transfers then.
Dear All,
I need to update material master in SAP GTS.
What IDOC type should be used for updating the material master
Thanks in advance !
Akshaya Lalchandani
Hi Akshaya,
There is no standard iDoc for updating the GTS Material Master or classification.
Could you tell us more about what you are trying to do, and why? Maybe we can help with other suggestions?...
Regards,
Dave