Hi Shrini,
Thanks for the info, I think it is not due to higher releases. Can you check your checking rules?
SPRO - GTS - Customs Management - Calculation of Customs Duty - Configure Control Settings of Customs Duty Calculation (pick your calculation profile)
Regards,
Satish
Thanks Satish. Checking rule C004 have been verified as well, no luck :-(
-Shrini
Hmm, wondering what else could be missing.
. OK, check one more thing.
In the calculation procedure (SPRO - GTS - Customs - Calculation of Customs Duty - Define Calculation Procedure for Customs Duties), screeprint the duty type definition.
If you're making a change to config, always check by creating a new customs dec.
Hi Ravi,
I'm a bit confused about your question. Why are you creating a license with a FM? Do you need a custom license determination logic? If yes, BADI /SAPSLL/LCC_DOCUMENT, method LICENSE_TYPES_GET can be used to determine license types and/or LICENSES_GET to determine relevant licenses.
Regards
Satish
Thanks again. I have validated the checking rule, calculation procedure (in the lower version it comes under the customs duty framework). I have validated there is no customized code within the declaration which can stop it from copying from the item level to item overview tab. It has been a tough nut to crack!
-Shrini
OK, i'll check and let you know if I find anything. If it is urgent, create an OSS incident.
It has been done already as well. I wanted to understand from the forum,
if anybody had noticed it on their versions and if it was it a bug! I'm getting to see the issue for the first time! SAP had reported on the earlier versions where the goods description doesn't appear and wasn't identified as bug on the item overview.
-Shrini
correction, typo error goods description was identified as a bug on the item overview!
Hi Shrini/Vaibhav,
I agree your suggestion but when I change the configuration under Control Structure for Address Compression ->Detail Control -> Search term Origin for Name -> Relational Operator to A (Comparison Index Contained in Keyword from Address) from B(Comparison Index and Keyword from Address are Identical )
blocking the partner since it is taking full Name1 and Name2 are single word without space
but the problem here is we are facing many blocks with even single word matched in the entire string
example is :
BP Name :
Name1 : Low Pressure
Name2 : Technologies MMC
SPL Name : A & K Technologies MMC
here MMC is in exclusion list, & is delimiter
Only Technologies is matching and causing the block similarly many blocks are occurring with single word match
if the we change configuration to A this is working but facing block with single word match
% match set is 76 and Originating Feature is 55
Please let me know your suggestions on this
Regards,
Hansi
Hi Hansik,
You have done the right setting with the relational operator. I would choose this setting only if I have a lot of names of the BPs populated in Name 1 and Name 2 field. Otherwise, I would leave it to be relational operator B setting.
There is another setting on top of the relational operator which you should check out to get around with the single terms and that's the base value. On the same screen where you have done the relational operator setting, look for the setting Display Base Value - "1- Number of terms in Each SPL list name and Partner Name". Please make sure you have this setting, it should take care of the single word hits.
Good luck!
-Shrini
Hi Shobhit
Try using Business Transaction Type for (EXASP), this is helpful as End Use of product can be configured and mapped from ECC and you can activate license based on "Business Transaction Type).
It might required little enhancement at ECC side to determine corresponding End Use based on "Product ~ Customer provided detail". Key is Ultimate Consignee (Customer) have to provide to End Use of Product, which need to be made available at sales order creation/save, once available GTS block sales order for respective license assignment.
Regards- Aamir
Dear experts
When i create the PO, if the compliance check is blocked. can we set an error message that can not save the PO?
Dear Mohammed
Check ST22 Transaction with devoloper
Hello Expert,
During my testing I created an order for country US/China with the name of OSAMA BIN LADEN. But order not blocking for SPL screening.
But when I simulate General address check in GTS it's showing status block as you can see int the screen shot. Where I am missing information.
Thanks
Ramesh
Need help with setting up email output in GTS to go to one central inbox. The documents might be created by different people.
We have had recommendations from consultants to set-up a printer device with a email id linked to the printer device, and propose the printer to the output in order to send email to a central inbox. But this design would mean that if we have different legal regulations and want a central inbox for each legal regulation, then we need several printer device for such activity. I am familiar with ECC and somehow this solution does not seem optimal. Can anyone help on how we can configure the system to send the output to a central email inbox?
Hi Jose.
This is not possible in standard though you can try some enhancement.
As per standard, you always want to review the block before really deciding whether to proceed with the transaction or not. License block is a kind of soft block where you can always proceed with the transaction by assigning a valid license whereas SPL block is a kind of hard block but still you always want compliance team to review the block to see if it is not a false block.
Setting up system such that it doesn't create a document if compliance block is encountered doesn't make sense to me.
it would be good if you can provide the business scenario or justification for such requirement.
thanks,
Kul Vaibhav
Hi Ramesh,
Check if you have care of name in your business partner.
regards,
Kul Vaibhav
Hi Padma,
do you want to send this notification for blocked documents in GTS?
regards,
Kul Vaibhav
Hi Mohammed,
Can you check and confirm if you are using a trusted RFC connection?
regards,
Kul Vaibhav
No, this is not for blocked documents. We use Trade Preference. Trying to send all the DOO output from trade preference to a central email ID - essentially a distribution list.